magnetic separators

magnetic separators

The science of magnetic separation has experienced extraordinary technological advancements over the past decade. As a consequence, new applications and design concepts in magnetic separation have evolved. This has resulted in a wide variety of highly effective and efficient magnetic separator designs.

In the past, a process engineer faced with a magnetic separation project had few alternatives. Magnetic separation was typically limited and only moderately effective. Magnetic separators that utilized permanent ferrite magnets, such as drum-type separators, generated relatively low magnetic field strengths. These separators worked well collecting ferrous material but were ineffective on fine paramagnetic particles. High intensity magnetic separators that were effective in collecting fine paramagnetic particles utilized electromagnetic circuits. These separators were large, heavy, low capacity machines that typically consumed an inordinate amount of power and required frequent maintenance. New developments in permanent magnetic separation technology now provide an efficient alternative for separation of paramagnetic materials.

Technological advances in the field of magnetic separation are the result of several recent developments. First, and perhaps most important, is the ability to precisely model magnetic circuits using sophisticated multi-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA). Although FEA is not a new tool, developments in computing speed over the last decade have made this tool readily accessible to the design engineer. In this technique, a scaled design of the magnetic circuit is created and the magnetic characteristics of the individual components quantified. The FEA model is then executed to determine the magnetic field intensity and gradient. Using this procedure, changes to the magnetic circuit design can be quickly evaluated to determine the optimum separator configuration. This technique can be applied to the design of both permanent and electromagnetic circuits. As a consequence, any type of magnetic separator can be developed (or redesigned) with a high level of confidence and predictability.

Equally important has been the recent development of rare-earth permanent magnets. Advances in rare-earth magnet materials have revolutionized the field of magnetic separation. The advent of rare-earth permanent magnets in the 1980s provided a magnetic energy product an order of magnitude greater than that of conventional ferrite magnets. Rare-earth magnetic circuits commonly exhibit a magnetic attractive force 20 to 30 times greater than that of conventional ferrite magnets. This development has provided for the design of high-intensity magnetic circuits that operate energy-free and surpass the strength and effectiveness of electromagnets.

Finally, the materials of construction used in the fabrication of magnetic separators have advanced to a point that significantly extends service life while decreasing maintenance. Advanced materials, such as fiber composites, kevlar, ultra high molecular weight polyester, and specialty steel alloys are now commonly used in contact areas of the separator. These materials are lightweight, abrasion resistant, and comparatively inexpensive resulting in significant design advantages as compared to previous construction materials.

The evolution of high strength permanent rare-earth magnets has led to the development of high-intensity separators that operate virtually energy free. The use of rare-earth magnetic separators for beneficiation of industrial minerals has become the industry standard with literally hundreds of separators placed in recent years. The following sections present an overview of the most widely used permanent magnetic separators: rare-earth drum and rare-earth roll-type separators.

Of the roll separators, there are at least fourteen manufacturers. Most of the different makes are based on the original Permroll design concept originated by this author. Various enhancements have been mainly focused on the belt tracking methods. New magnetic roll configurations and optimization of roll designs are relatively recent innovations. Additional optimization efforts are in progress.

At last count, seven manufacturers have commercially available drum separators, most based on magnet circuits derived from the use of conventional ferrite magnet. Two unique designs have been developed with one clearly offering advantages over older configurations.

Rare-earth elements have some unique properties that are used in many common applications, such as TV screens and lighters. In the 1970s, rare-earths began to be used in a new generation of magnetic materials, that have very unique characteristics. Not only were these stronger in the sense of attraction force between a magnet and mild steel (high induction, B), the coercivity (Hc) is extremely high. This property makes the magnetization of the magnet body composed of a rare-earth element alloy very stable, i.e., it cannot easily be demagnetized.

It was a well known fact that permanent magnets positioned on both sides of a flat steel body can magnetize the steel to a high level, if the magnet poles were the same on each side, i.e., the magnets would repel each other. However, in the past, large magnet volumes were required to achieve any substantial magnetization. With the new powerful magnets, the magnet volume could be relatively small to generate high steel magnetization. In 1981 this author determined the optimum ring size for samarium-cobalt magnets. Maximum steel magnetization (near saturation) could be obtained if the rings were stacked to make a roll using a 4:1 ratio of magnet to steel thickness, see Figure 1. Since magnetized particles are attracted to the magnetized steel surface on the roll periphery, this means that 20% of the exposed roll surface would collect such material. This collection area is an order of magnitude greater than what could be achieved with prior art magnets, making the magnetic roll useful for mineral separation.

Although one of the first prototype rare-earth magnetic rolls was calculated to have about 14,000 gauss steel magnetization, it was found in comparative testing with electromagnetic induced roll (IMR) separators operating at about 21,000 gauss, that similar performance was obtained in fine particle processing (smaller than 1 mm). When processing coarser particles an improved performance was established (e.g., less weakly magnetic contaminants remaining in the upgraded product and fewer separation passes to achieve high quality). The improvement results because the magnetic force acting on the particles is high, due to a high flux gradient. An electromagnetic induced magnetic roll separator has an air gap, which must be increased to accommodate the processing of larger particles. The rare-earth magnetic roll (REMR) magnetic separator has no such air gap. Consequently, the magnetic force does not decline in the manner of an IMR set with a large air gap.

As the name implies, suspended magnets are installed over conveyors to lift tramp iron out of the burden. Suspended magnets have been more frequently applied as conveyor speeds have increased. Suspended type magnets are capable of developing very deep magnetic fields and magnet suspension heights as high as 36 are possible.

Suspended magnets are of two basic types (1) circular and (2) rectangular. Because of cost considerations, the rectangular suspended magnet is nearly always used. Magnet selection requires careful analysis of the individual system to insure adequate tramp iron removal. Factors that must be considered include:

The position in which the magnet must be mounted will also influence the size of magnet required. The preferred position is at an angle over the head pulley of the conveyor where the load breaks open and the tramp iron is free to move easily to the magnet face. When the suspended magnet must be mounted back from the head pulley parallel to the conveyor, tramp iron removal is more difficult and a stronger magnet is required.

Magnetic drum separators come in many different styles. Tramp iron drum separators usually use a magnet design referred to as a radial type. In such a unit the magnet poles alternate across the width of the drum and are of the same polarity at any point along the drums circumference. The magnet assembly is held stationary by clamp bearings and the drum shell is driven around this magnet assembly.

Drum-separators lend themselves to installation in chutes or at the discharge point of bucket elevators or screen conveyors.The capacity and type of tramp iron to be removed will determine the size selection of a drum separator. They are available in both permanent and electro magnetic types.

Standard drum diameters are 30 and 36. General guide lines, in diameter selection, are based on (1) feed volume (2) magnetic loadings and (3) particle size. The 30 diameter drum guide lines are roughly maximum of 75 GPM per foot feed volume, 8 TPH per foot magnetic loading and 10 mesh particle size. The 36 guide lines are 125 GPM per foot feed volume, 15 TPH per foot magnetic loading and 3/8 inch particle size.

For many years, wet magnetic drum separator magnet rating has been on the basis of a specified gauss reading at 2 from the drum face. The gauss reading is an average of readings taken at the centerline of each pole and the center of the magnet gap measured 2 inches from the drum surface. This rating tends to ignore edge of pole readings and readings inside of the 2 inch distance, particularly surface readings which are highly important in effective magnetic performance.

We have previously discussed dry drum separators as used for tramp iron removal. A second variety of drum separator is the alternating polarity drum separator. This separator is designed to handle feeds having a high percentage of magnetics and to obtain a clean, high grade, magnetic concentrate product. The magnet assembly is made up of a series of poles that are uniform in polarity around the drum circumference. The magnet arc conventionally covers 210 degrees. The magnet assembly is held in fixed operating position by means of clamp bearings and the cylinder is driven around this assembly.

Two styles of magnet assemblies are made up in alternating polarity design. The old Ball-Norton type design has from 8 to 10 poles in the 210 arc and develops a relatively deep magnetic field. This design can effectively handle material as coarse as 1 inch while at the same time imparting enough agitation in traversing the magnetic arc to effectively reject non-magnetic material and produce a clean magnetic concentrate product. The 30 diameter alternating polarity drum is usually run in the 25 to 35 RPM speed range.

Application of the high intensity cross-belt is limited to material finer than 1/8 inch size with a minimum amount of minus 200 mesh material. The cost of this separator is relatively high per unit of capacity approaching $1000 per inch of feed width as compared to $200 per inch of feed width on the induced roll separator.

This investigation for an improved separator is a continuation of the previously reported pioneering research of the Bureau of Mines on the matrix-type magnetic separator. When operated with direct current. or a constant magnetic field, the matrix-type magnetic separator has several disadvantages, which include incomplete separation of magnetic and nonmagnetic components in one pass and the retention of some of the. magnetic fraction at the discharge quadrant. Since the particle agitation that results from pulsed magnetic fields may overcome these factors, operation with an alternating current would be an improvement. Another possibility is the separation of dry feeds, which may have applications where the use of water must be avoided.

The effects of an alternating field were first described by Mordey and later by others of whom Doan provides a bibliographical resume. The significant feature to note in the description by Mordey is the change from a repulsion in weak fields to an attraction in strong fields, in addition to a difference in response with different minerals. The application by Mordey was with wet feeds using launders and inclined surfaces, although applications by others are with both wet and dry feeds.

Except for occasional later references the interest in alternating current for magnetic separation has almost disappeared. Lack of interest is probably due to the apparent high power consumption required to generate sufficiently intense magnetic fields, a problem that warrants further consideration.

The matrix separator differed somewhat from the slotted pole type described in a previous report in that the flux passed into the matrix from only one side, the inverted U-shaped magnet cores 4 and 7 illustrated in figure 1. Figure 1 shows a front view, side view, and a bottom view of the matrix-type magnetic separator. By this arrangement, an upward thrust could be exerted on the matrix disk during each current peak; the resulting induced vibration would accelerate the passage of the feed as well as the separation of the magnetic particles from the nonmagnetic particles since the applied field during the upward thrust preferentially lifts

The matrix disk 5 rotates successively through field and field-free quadrants. Where a given point on the disk emerges into a field quadrant, feed is added from a vibrating feeder; nonmagnetic particles fall through the matrix, and magnetic particles are retained and finally discharged in the succeeding field-free quadrant.

Two types of disks were used, a sphere matrix illustrated in top and cross-sectional views in figure 2 and a grooved plate type similarly illustrated in figure 3. Both the spheres and grooved plates were mounted on a nonmagnetic support 1 of optimum thickness for vibration movement (figs. 2-3). The sphere matrix disk, similar to that of the earlier model, had a matrix diameter 8 of 8.5 inches and spokes 7 spaced 45 apart; the spheres were retained by brass screens 4 (fig. 2).

The grooved plate disk was an assemblage of grooved steel plates that tapered so that one edge 5 was thinner than the other 6 (fig. 4) to provide a stack in the form of a circle having an outside diameter 9 of 7.9 inches (fig. 3). The plates were retained by two split aluminum rings 8 and 3 clamped in two places 1 and 11. They were stacked so that the vertically oriented grooves of one plate touched the flat side of the second plate. As illustrated in figure 4, two slots 3 and 4 were added to reduce eddy current losses.

Both disks 5 illustrated in figure 1 were rotated by a pulley 1 through a steel shaft 8 held by two aluminum bars 2 and which in turn were fastened to aluminum bars 3 and steel bars 6. The magnetic cores 4 and 7 were machined from 10- by 12-inch E-shaped Orthosil transformer laminations. For wet feeds,

With the information derived from the performance of this separator, a cross-belt-type separator was also constructed as illustrated in figure 5, which shows a front view and a cross-sectional view through the center of the magnet core. The cross-belt separator mentioned here differs somewhat from the conventional cross-belt separator in that the belt 5 moves parallel to the feed direction instead of 90 with the feed direction. The magnetic core, composed of parts 17, 19, 21 and 22 that were machined from 7--by 9 inch E-shaped Orthosil transformer laminations, supplies a magnetic field between one magnetic pole 6, which has grooves running parallel to the feed direction, and the other magnetic pole 14. Owing to the higher intensity field at the projection from the grooves, magnetic particles are lifted from feeder 15 to the belt 5. By movement on flat-faced pulleys 3 supported by bearings 4 the belt 5 carries the particles to the discharge chute 7. Nonmagnetic particles fall from the feeder edge and are discharged on the chute 8. A special 0.035-inch-thick Macarco neoprene-dacron endless belt permits a close approach of the feeder surface to the magnet pole 6. The feeder 15 constructed of plexiglass to prevent vibration dampening by eddy currents, is fastened to a vibration drive at 16 derived from a small vibrating feeder used for granular materials. A constant distance between poles 6 and 14 was maintained by acrylic plastic plates 9 on each side of the poles 6 and 14 with a recessed portion 13 to provide room for the belt 5 and feeder 15. The structural support for the separator, which consisted of parts 1, 2, 11, 18, and 20, was constructed of 2- by 2- by -inch aluminum angle to form a rectangular frame, and part 10 was machined from angular stock to form a support for the magnet core.

Each U-shaped magnet core in figure 1 was supplied with two 266-turn coils and two 133-turn coils of No. 10 AWG (American wire gage) heavy polythermaleze-insulated copper wire. With alternating current excitation, the current and voltage are out of phase so that the kilovolt-ampere value is very high even though the actual kilowatt power is low. This difference may be corrected with either series capacitors to reduce the input voltage or parallel capacitors to reduce the input current. However, the circuit that was selected is illustrated in figure 6 in which the two 266-turn coils are connected in series with the capacitor 2. Power is supplied by the 133-turn drive coil 7 that is connected in series with the 133-turn drive coil 9 on the other U-shaped magnet core. Coils 4 and 6 and the capacitor 2 form a circuit that resonates at 60 hertz when the capacitor 2 has a value of 49 microfarads in accordance with the equation

For the capacitance in the power input circuit, the value is calculated on the basis of the equality of equations 2-3. When the input at point 10 is 10 amperes at 126 volts or 1.26 kilovolt-amperes, the current at point 3 and the voltage at

point 1 are 10 amperes and 550 volts, respectively, or a total of 11.0 kilovoIt-amperes for the two magnet cores, which provides a 5,320-ampere- turn magnetization current. The capacitors, a standard power factor correction type, had a maximum rating of 600 volts at 60 hertz.

Application of alternating current to the cross-belt separator is not successful. In contrast to the matrix-type separator in which the feed is deposited on the magnetized matrix, the feed for the cross belt is some distance below a magnet pole where the field is weaker and the force is a repulsion. Even though the magnetic force with the matrix-type separator may be a repulsion instead of an attraction, it would result in the retention of the magnetic fraction in the matrix. Replacement of the alternating current with an intermittent current eliminates the repulsion effect but still retains the particle vibration characteristics.

For an intermittent current the circuit shown in figure 7 is used. A diode 5 supplies the current to a coil 4, which can be the magnetizing coil for the cross-belt separator, or for one magnet core of the matrix-type separator that is connected in parallel or series with the coil for the other core. A coil 2 is supplied with half-wave-rectified current from a diode 6 but is out of phase with the other coil 4 and is only applicable to a second separator. However, the circuit illustrates the reduction of the kilovolt-ampere load of intermittent magnetizing currents. As an example, measurements were, made with the two magnet cores of figure 1; each core had 532 turns of wire. When the capacitor 9 has a value of 72 microfarads, the current at point 8 is 13 amperes, and the voltages at points 10, 1, and 7 are 75, 440, and 390 volts, respectively. The kilovoIt-ampere input at point 11 is therefore 0.98, and the kilovolt-amperes supplied to the coils is 5.07. This circuit is not a simple resonance circuit, as shown in figure 6, but a circuit in which the correct value of the capacitor 9 depends on the current. At currents lower than 13 amperes, the 72-microfarad value is too large.

However, separations with intermittent current were confined to a simple one-diode circuit. With the matrix-type separator, each magnet core carried 10.5 amperes at 240 volts through 399 wire turns or a total of 21 amperes since the two cores were connected in parallel. For the cross-

belt separator illustrated in figure 5, five 72-turn coils and one 96-turn coil wound with No. 6 AWG heavy polythermaleze-insulated square copper wire were used in series connection. Current-carrying capacity is approximately 40 amperes with an input of approximately 80 volts of half-wave-rectified 60-hertz current. At 40 amperes, the average number of ampere turns would be 18,240. Intermittent current and voltage were measured with the same dynamometer meters used for alternating current; these meters measure an average value.

It is possible to increase the magnetizing current for the matrix-type separator without excessive vibration by increasing the thickness of the plate 1 (figs. 2-3). Another alternative is a combination of intermittent and constant magnetic fields. Although a variety of circuits are possible, the combination of fields was accomplished with the simple adaptation of the stray field losses in a U-shaped magnet core using the circuit of figure 8. The power drawn is full-wave rectification, or half wave for each leg of the magnet core with the flux, from the coils 3 and 4 adding. Owing to magnetic leakage, the flux from the coil nearest to the magnet pole tested predominates. When the magnetic field is measured with a Bell model 300 gaussmeter and observed with a Tektronix type 547 oscilloscope with a type 1A1 amplifier, the results of figure 9 represent a pulsating magnetic field on top of a constant magnetic field plateau.

Although it is known that minerals in water suspension may be separated in the constant-field matrix-type separator at fine sizes, some tests were conducted to investigate if any beneficial effects exist with an intermittent field. One advantage that was found with a minus 325-mesh feed was an increase in the completeness of the discharge of the magnetic fraction with an intermittent field as illustrated in tables 1-2. Both tests had the same average current of 10.5 amperes through the magnetizing coils of each magnet core illustrated in figure 7. The matrix consisted of 1/16-inch-diameter steel spheres.

In the two short-period comparative tests, the wash water for removing the magnetic fraction was the same and was of a quantity that permitted complete discharge with the intermittent field and partial removal with the constant field. After the test was completed, magnetic particles retained with the constant field were determined by a large increase in the intensity of flow of wash water, a flow volume that would not be practical for normal operation. For separation efficiency, the intermittent field had no advantage over the constant field probably because of a lack of vibration response with minus 325-mesh particles at 60 hertz. This will be described later with dry feeds.

Dry magnetic separation at coarse sizes is not a problem because it may be accomplished with a variety of separator types. Difficulty at fine sizes is twofold. First, the feed rate capacity decreases in the separators with moving conveyor surfaces such as the induced roll and cross-belt separators in which the attracted magnetic particles would have to move at nominal feed rates through a thick layer of nonmagnetic particles; second, an agglomeration effect is present that increases with decrease in particle size.

Results of the separation of several mineral combinations in the size range of minus 200 plus 325 mesh are summarized in tables 3-5. Table 3 illustrates the separation of -Fe2O3 from quartz in an ore with one pass through a matrix of 1/8-inch-diameter steel spheres using the alternating current circuit of figure 6.

Application of an intermittent field with a matrix of 75 percent 1/16-inch-diameter steel spheres and 25 percent 1/8-inch-diameter steel spheres is illustrated in table 4 in a one-pass separation of pyrrhotite from quartz using the circuit of figure 7. Unlike table 3, no attempt was made to obtain an intermediate fraction, which would have resulted in raising and lowering the iron compositions of the magnetic and nonmagnetic fractions, respectively, and provided a fraction for repass with increased recovery.

Table 5 gives the results of the application of a partially modulated field using the circuit of figure 8 and the grooved plate matrix of figure 3 in a one-pass separation of ilmenite from quartz. The advantage of the grooved plate over the spheres is that the particles pass through the matrix in a shorter time. The high flow rate obtained using the grooved plate could be increased further, particularly if water is used, by attaching suction chambers under the disk in a manner similar to applications with continuous vacuum filters. Although the grade and recovery of ilmenite are very high, this need not necessarily be attributed to the grooved-plate matrix since the ampere turns are higher than in any of the other tests. Increased ampere turns is a prerequisite for successful application of alternating current separators and intermittent current separators.

When a minus 325-mesh fraction is tested, a separation sometimes occurs, but in most cases the feed passes through without separation. Response at higher frequencies was investigated with a smaller -inch-cross section U-shaped magnet core 1 (fig. 10). Separation was performed with a nonmagnetic nonconducting plane surface 3 moved manually across the magnet pole as illustrated by the direction arrow 4. When separation occurred, the nonmagnetic mineral 5 would move with the plane, and the magnetic mineral would separate from the nonmagnetic mineral by remaining attached to the magnet pole. When no separation occurred, the entire mixture of magnetic and nonmagnetic minerals would either move with the plane or adhere to the magnet pole.

Four magnetising coils of 119 turns each of No. 14 AWG copper wire were used; three were connected in series with a capacitor as in figure 6, and one was connected to a variable-frequency power supply. The current in the resonant circuit is approximately 5 amperes. When the capacitor has a value of 49 microfarads, the resonant frequency is 130 hertz, and no separation occurs. With the capacitor reduced to 10 microfarads to provide a resonant frequency of 300 hertz, a separation occurs. In the case of a minus 325-mesh -Fe2O3-quartz mixture, most of the quartz moves with the plane, and the -Fe2O3 remains attached to the magnet pole. Similar results are obtained with pyrrhotite-quartz. Indications are that the separation may be improved with preliminary treatment of the feed by dry grinding aids.

frequencies, the time per cycle is too short to permit initial magnetization; at very low frequencies, the magnetization is in phase with the field. The frequencies reported here are between these two extremes and probably near, and just above, the low frequency limit. Experimental values on particles in the size range of minus 35 plus 65 mesh were previously published. These data indicate that 0.16 second, the time required to traverse a magnetizing field distance of 0.9 inch at 5.5 inches per second, is adequate time for the magnetization of minerals, but 0.02 second, the time required to traverse approximately 0.1 inch at the same rate, is too short. Time lag has been reported in the literature for magnetic alloys and has been classified, to the exclusion of the eddy current lag, into a lag that is dependent on impurities and a Jordan lag that is independent of temperature.

From evidence derived from the Barkhausen effect, the magnetization does not proceed uniformly and simultaneously throughout a specimen but is initiated in a limited region from which it spreads in a direction parallel to the field direction at a finite velocity. In a changing magnetic field, the number of initiating nuclei is proportional to the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the direction of the field. For a specimen in the form of a cube, the rate of energy W transferred to the cube would therefore be proportional to the aforementioned cross-sectional area so that for a cube of side s,

Application of intermittent current to the cross-belt separator arose from the need for the dry separation of an iron composition material from the copper in a product submitted by personnel of a Bureau of Mines chalcopyrite vacuum decomposition project. Although this product was of a relatively coarse size, the matted mass resulting from the needle shape or fiber form of the copper and the magnetic field coagulation effects of the magnetic particles prevented use of commercial dry separators such as the induced roll separator and constant-field cross-belt separator. The pulsating magnetic field had a separation effect similar to the pulsations in a hydraulic jig; the pulsating magnetic field permits the nonmagnetic fibers to sink back to the vibrating feeder and allows the magnetic particles to rise to the belt. Other applications would include fibrous minerals such as tremolite, actinolite, and chrysolite, and matted and fibrous secondary materials.

Application of alternating and intermittent current to magnetic separation at a relatively high number of ampere turns was made possible by special electronic circuits. Actual power losses are low and include the IR loss, which is the same that occurs in direct-current magnetic separation, and the core loss, which has a magnitude corresponding to the IR loss. Minerals may be dry-separated close to the minus 325-mesh size at 60-hertz frequency and possibly at smaller particle sizes at higher frequency. In the wet separation of minus 325-mesh feeds, intermittent current provides for complete release of the magnetic fraction during the discharge cycle. For matted fibrous and magnetically coagulating feeds, a cross-belt separator with an intermittent magnetizing current provides efficient separations.

magnetic separation technology for a recycling industry

magnetic separation technology for a recycling industry

Magnetic Separation is the process, in which the magnetically caused material is detached easily by using a magnetic force. From last many years, magnetic separators are used for various separation process in recycling industry like Glass recycling, Scrap material, Pet flakes, Plastic recycling, Rubber recycling, Municipal solid waste (MSW), e-waste recycling etc.

Magnetic Separator is the most trusted machine used to recover metal from the waste materials. It is known for the easy separation process to detach fine particles which have poor magnetic properties. Magnetic separator provides the excellent separating effect, as it uses dynamic magnetic system design. Recycling industries are using magnetic separator because of its various advantages like large handling capacity, low maintenance rate, simple structure and adjustable magnetic field intensity.

Eddy Current Separator is the most trusted separator, used to segregate valuable non-ferrous metals like aluminium, brass, copper, lead etc. It has an advantage of high frequency and high separation capability. Eddy Current Separator is robustly constructed with anti-vibration pads and its powerful quality of magnets provides the best and smooth separation for the recycling industry.

It has a capacity from 2MT/hr to 15MT/hr. Eddy Current provides its best separation service in various fields of recycling industry like plastic, rubber, glass, municipal solid waste, e-waste, pet etc. And the industries can take a huge advantage of using eddy current separator for their current application.

Overband Magnetic Separator is known for providing the excellent service of separating tramp iron from the material that is being processed on the conveyor belt or a vibratory feeder. Overband magnetic separator is used to protect machines like crushers, shredders by removing ferrous particles and it easily removes the heavy dust particles. It is used in many industries like food, sponge iron, charcoal, glass etc.

Specially designed Magnetic Head Pulley to detach tramp metals like steel, bucket teeth, bore crowns, bar scrap, chains, and tools. Recycling industries are using Magnetic Head Pulleys to segregate steel, municipal waste and many other ferrous contaminations like cans, nuts, nails etc.

From last many decades, Manufacturing industries are playing a most crucial role in our global economy. They are trying to develop high capacity and high-frequency pumps for the recycling industry, because theyre facing an issue of sorting recyclable material by removing various tramp metals like steel, bucket teeth, bore crowns etc.

Machines are not able to provide the best separation solution in the various field of recycling industry like plastic, rubber, glass, municipal solid waste, e-waste, pet etc. After facing these all issues regularly they are looking for high capacity which is having high-intensity magnets to remove impurities easily.

Jaykrishna magnetic Pvt. Ltd. understands all problems that the industries are facing now!!! We design a machine which is of high capacity that easily recovers metal from the waste materials. Our machines are evolved by using the latest technology that can be easily operated and to provide best separation results in various fields of the recycling industry.

We are famous for manufacturing and supplying magnetic separators which is of high capacity that easily provides the perfect separation solution. Jaykrishna Magnetic Pvt. Ltd. has 38+ years of experience in developing machines which are highly efficient and easy to handle.

Our magnetic separators are designed by the team of experts who have a great knowledge of designing and developing various types of magnetic separators and vibratory equipment. Our experts take care of clients need, before supplying any machine to them.

Our machines are installed in various fields of recycling industry like plastic, rubber, glass, municipal solid waste, e-waste, pet etc. We also design different types of magnetic separators like Eddy current separators, Overband Magnetic Separator and Magnetic Head Pulley as per the clients requirement to deliver them a best product.

If you are facing a problem of extracting tramp metals steel, bucket teeth, bore crowns etc. then feel free to contact us. Our team will get back to you with the best and effective solution that solves your problem.

Jaykrishna Magnetics Pvt. Ltd. is the leading manufacturer and exporter of Magnetic and Vibratory Equipments in India. We are established since 1978. The unique and premium structural design imparts quality and elegance to our products. Our focus is on continuously improving our process, service and products to exceed the benchmarks set by our competitors and offer better products to you.

wet magnetic drum separator

wet magnetic drum separator

Low-intensity separators are used to treat ferromagnetic materials and some highly paramagnetic minerals.Minerals with ferromagnetic properties have high susceptibility at low applied field strengths and can therefore be concentrated in low intensity (<~0.3T) magnetic separators. For low-intensity drum separators used in the iron ore industry, the standard field, for a separator with ferrite-based magnets, is 0.12 T at a distance of 50 mm from the drum surface. Work has also shown that such separators have maximum field strengths on the drum surface of less than 0.3 T. The principal ferromagnetic mineral concentrated in mineral processing is magnetite (Fe3O4). although hematite (Fe2O3) and siderite Fe2CO3 can be roasted to produce magnetite and hence give good separation in low-intensity machines.

Permanent magnetic drum separators combine the attributes of a high-strength permanent magnetic field and a self-cleaning feature. These separators are effective in treating process streams containing a high percentage of magnetics and can produce a clean magnetic or non-magnetic product. The magnetic drum separator consists of a stationary, shaft-mounted magnetic circuit completely enclosed by a rotating drum. The magnetic circuit is typically comprised of several magnetic poles that span an arc of 120 degrees. When material is introduced to the revolving drum shell (concurrent at the 12 oclock position), the non-magnetic material discharges in a natural trajectory. The magnetic material is attracted to the drum shell by the magnetic circuit and is rotated out of the non-magnetic particle stream. The magnetic material discharges from the drum shell when it is rotated out of the magnetic field.

Permanent magnetic drum separators have undergone significant technological advancements in recent years. The magnetic circuit may consist of one of several designs depending on the application. Circuit design variations include:

The standard magnetic drum configuration consists of series of axial poles configured with an alternating polarity. This type of drum is simple in design and can be effective for low-intensity applications such as the recovery of ferrous metals and magnetite. This configuration typically does not provide a sufficient field strength or gradient for the recovery of paramagnetic minerals at high capacities. A typical axial circuit is shown in Figure 3.

The high-gradient element, as the name implies, is designed to produce a very high field gradient and subsequently a high attractive force. Several identical agitating magnetic poles comprise the element. The poles are placed together minimizing the intervening air gap to produce the high surface gradient. Due to the high gradient, the attractive force is strongest closer to the drum making it most effective when utilized with a relatively low material burden depth on the drum surface and, thus, a lower unit capacity. A high-gradient magnetic circuit is shown in Figure 4.

The interpole-style element utilizes a true bucking magnetic pole or interpole between each main pole. The magnetic field of the bucking element is configured to oppose both of the adjacent main poles resulting in a greater projection of the magnetic field. As a result, the interpole circuit allows for a relatively high material burden depth on the drum surface and thus higher unit capacity or improved separation efficiency. An interpole magnetic circuit configuration is shown in Figure 5.

A second interpole configuration consists of steel pole pieces placed between the magnetic poles. This is commonly termed a salient-pole element. The steel interpoles concentrate the magnetic flux providing a very high magnetic gradient at the drum surface. The magnetic field configuration is similar to the high- gradient type element but with an intensified surface gradient. This configuration offers the strongest field projection of any of the previously described circuits. The salient-pole circuit design is shown in Figure 6.

The magnetic elements described above are axial elements. The magnetic poles run across the width of the drum and are of alternating polarity. Magnetic elements are typically assembled with a minimum of five magnetic poles that span an arc of 110 degrees. (For all practical purposes, an arc of only 80 degrees is required to impart a separation. Non-magnetic particles usually leave the drum surface with a natural trajectory at a point of 60 to 70 degrees from top dead center dependent on the drum speed, particle size, and specific gravity.) The poles have alternating polarity to provide agitation to the magnetic components as they are transferred out of the stream of the non-magnetics. A magnetic particle will tend to rotate 180 degrees as it moves across each pole. This agitation is functional in releasing physically entrapped non-magnetics from the bed of magnetics. Agitating magnetic drums are most effective in collecting fine particles or where the feed contains a high magnetics content.

Dense-medium circuits have been installed in many mineral treatment plants since its original development about thirty years ago. In the intervening period the process has been thoroughly evaluated and many innovations have been introduced. The Heavy Density Cyclone is one of the newer systems which has extended the operating range of this process to 65 mesh size.

Medium recovery is obviously important since any loss is a direct cost against production. In coarse coal dense-medium plants a loss of 1 pound of magnetite per ton is usually acceptable but reduction to pound per ton as has been obtained in some plants.

Efficient cleaning maintains fluidity in the bath and increases sharpness of the coal-waste separation. Most dense-medium systems will tolerate some non-magnetic dilution of the bath but the magnetic separator must be capable of keeping this within workable limits, particularly on difficult coals. In some plants a partial bleed of the operating dense-medium bath is maintained through the magnetic separator to keep it clean.

Operating gravities of dense-medium coal plants are usually low enough so that a straight magnetite bath can be used. The return of a magnetic separator concentrate having 50% or more solids will maintain gravity without need for a thickening device. The use of a drum wiper has permitted the return of a 70% solids concentrate back to the separatory vessel. Operation at a high solids concentrate discharge is recommended since medium cleaning is improved. The colloidal slimes carried over with water are more completely rejected at high solids discharge.

Several types of magnetic separators have been used in magnetic medium recovery.The first magnetic drum separators were electro magnetic types but the development of efficient wet permanent drum separators has resulted in nearly universal acceptance of permanent drums in new plants.

The basic construction of each drum is the same. It consists of a stationary magnet assembly held in a fixed operating position by clamp bearings mounted on the separator support frame. An outer rotating cylinder driven through a sprocket bolted to one of the drum heads carries the magnetic material to the magnetic discharge point.

Normally, extreme cleanliness of the magnetic concentrate is not of prime importance in dense-medium plants but this can be a factor in some coals that separate with difficulty. The concurrent tank, reduced separator loading and in some instances dilution of the feed pulp will improve magnetic cleaning. Recleaning of a primary concentrate would improve cleaning but has not been used in commercial plants.

technological advancements in magnetic resonance neurography | springerlink

technological advancements in magnetic resonance neurography | springerlink

Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is being increasingly used as a problem-solving tool for diagnosis and management of peripheral neuropathies. This review is aimed at summarizing important technological advances, including MR pulse sequence and surface coil developments, which have facilitated MRNs use in clinical practice.

The most recent research in MRN focuses on its clinical applications, with concomitant development of three-dimensional, parallel imaging and vascular suppression techniques that facilitate higher spatial resolution and depiction of small nerve branches arising from the brachial and lumbosacral plexi as well as fascicular abnormalities of more distal extremity nerves. Quantitative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been studied as a tool to detect microstructural abnormalities of peripheral nerves and more precisely define grades of nerve injury but will require additional investigation to determine its role in daily clinical practice.

MRN continues to evolve due to technological improvements and awareness by the medical community of its capabilities. Additional technological developments related to surface coil designs and vascular suppression techniques will be needed to move the field forward.

Heinen C, Dmer P, Schmidt T, Kewitz B, Janssen-Biehnhold U, Kretschmer T. Fascicular ratio pilot study: high-resolution neurosonography-a possible tool for quantitative assessment of traumatic peripheral nerve lesions before and after nerve surgery. Neurosurgery. 2018;85:415422.

McGee KP, Stormont RS, Lindsay SA, Taracila V, Savitskij D, Robb F, et al. Characterization and evaluation of a flexible MRI receive coil array for radiation therapy MR treatment planning using highly decoupled RF circuits. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:08NT02.

Sneag DB, Rancy SK, Wolfe SW, Lee SC, Kalia V, Lee SK, et al. Brachial plexitis or neuritis? MRI features of lesion distribution in parsonage-turner syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2018;58:35966 This study demonstrates that the prevailing imaging findings in Parsonage-Turner syndrome are intrinsic constrictions of peripheral nerves distal to the brachial plexus proper.

Chhabra A, Thawait GK, Soldatos T, Thakkar RS, Del Grande F, Chalian M, et al. High-resolution 3T MR neurography of the brachial plexus and its branches, with emphasis on 3D imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:48697.

Sneag DB, Mendapara P, Zhu JC, Lee SC, Lin B, Curlin J, et al. Prospective respiratory triggering improves high resolution brachial plexus magnetic resonance image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49:17239.

Cervantes B, Kirschke JS, Klupp E, Kooijman H, Brnert P, Haase A, et al. Orthogonally combined motion- and diffusion-sensitized driven equilibrium (OC-MDSDE) preparation for vessel signal suppression in 3D turbo spin echo imaging of peripheral nerves in the extremities. Magn Reson Med. 2017;79:40715 This article describes a non-contrast technique for vascular suppression in MRN.

Wang L, Niu Y, Kong X, Yu Q, Kong X, Lv Y, et al. The application of paramagnetic contrast-based T2 effect to 3D heavily T2W high-resolution MR imaging of the brachial plexus and its branches. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:57884.

Sneag DB, Curlin J, Shin J, Fung M, Lin B, Daniels SP. High-resolution brachial plexus imaging using 3-D short tau inversion recovery (CUBESTIR) with IV gadolinium for vascular suppression. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Meeting. May 14, 2019.

Shah P, Argentieri E, Koff MF, Sneag DB. Quantitative evaluation of T2 signal intensity for the assessment of muscle denervation. ISMRM 25th Scientific Meeting & Exhibition. Honolulu, HI. April 2227, 2017.

Heskamp L, van Nimwegen M, Ploegmakers MJ, Bassez G, Deux JF, Cumming SA, et al. Lower extremity muscle pathology in myotonic dystrophy type 1 assessed by quantitative MRI. Neurology. 2019;92:e280314.

Chhabra A, Belzberg AJ, Rosson GD, Thawait GK, Chalian M, Farahani SJ, et al. Impact of high resolution 3 tesla MR neurography (MRN) on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic patient management. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:123544.

Yoon D, Biswal S, Rutt B, Lutz A, Hargreaves B. Feasibility of 7T MRI for imaging fascicular structures of peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve. 2018;57:4948 This article describes the role of 7T for evaluating fascicular architecture of peripheral nerves.

Shin J, Curlin J, Tan ET, Fung M, Sneag DB. Denoising of diffusion MRI improves peripheral nerve conspicuity and reproducibility. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Meeting. Montreal, Canada. May 13, 2019.

Balsiger F, Steindel C, Arn M, Wagner B, Grunder L, El-Koussy M, et al. Segmentation of peripheral nerves from magnetic resonance neurography: a fully-automatic, deep learning-based approach. Front Neurol. 2018;9:777.

The authors would like to thank Drs. Fraser Robb and Yun-Jeong Stickle from GE Healthcare, Inc., in Aurora, OH, for designing and building the 64-channel prototype brachial plexus coil mentioned in this article.

magnetic chute separator market size, growth evolution, trends, demand, analysis, segment and forecasts report, 2027|eclipse magnetics, yate magnetics, sollau etc. the manomet current

magnetic chute separator market size, growth evolution, trends, demand, analysis, segment and forecasts report, 2027|eclipse magnetics, yate magnetics, sollau etc. the manomet current

The report provides a basic overview of the Magnetic Chute Separator industry including definitions, classifications, applications and industry chain structure. Also the market provides development policies, plans, manufacturing processes and cost structures.

The research report analyzes Magnetic Chute Separator in terms of its market value, trends, competitive scenario, and potential growth opportunities. Global Magnetic Chute Separator Market Report thoroughly covers analyzed insights in view of the global Magnetic Chute Separator market along with its ever-changing patterns, infrastructural properties, industry environment, and all dominant aspects of the market. The report discusses market growth and influential elements in-depth including increased commercialization, sweeping demands, and latest technological advancements.

The global Magnetic Chute Separator market also reviews how the market has been strengthening its base internationally by influencing and highly contributing to global revenue generation. Moreover, the report comes off to provide significant statistical information in terms of sales and revenue grounds on applications, regions, leading market player, technology and product type.

Detailed Overview of Global Magnetic Chute Separator market will help deliver clients and businesses making strategies. Influencing factors that thriving demand and latest trend running in the market What is the market concentration? Is it fragmented or highly concentrated? What trends, challenges and barriers will impact the development and sizing of Global Magnetic Chute Separator market SWOT Analysis of each defined key players along with its profile and Porters five forces tool mechanism to compliment the same. What growth momentum or acceleration market carries during the forecast period? Which region may tap highest market share in coming era? What would be the market share of key countries like North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia & India etc.? What focused approach and constraints are holding the Global Magnetic Chute Separator market tight?

Market Strides is a Global aggregator and publisher of Market intelligence research reports, equity reports, database directories, and economic reports. Our repository is diverse, spanning virtually every industrial sector and even more every category and sub-category within the industry. Our market research reports provide market sizing analysis, insights on promising industry segments, competition, future outlook and growth drivers in the space. The company is engaged in data analytic and aids clients in due-diligence, product expansion, plant setup, acquisition intelligence to all the other gamut of objectives through our research focus.

Our pre-onboarding strategy for publishers is perhaps, what makes us stand out in the market space. Publishers & their market research reports are meticulously validated by our in-house panel of consultants, prior to a feature on our website. These in-house panel of consultants are also in charge of ensuring that our website features the most updated reports only.

top 5 magnetic separation innovations

top 5 magnetic separation innovations

A developed technology Magnets have been used to manufacture mineral processing machines for decades. Given their history, magnetic technology and physics are recognised as a developed art. In the global magnetic separation industry, the magnetic heart of the machine has generally remained unchanged and short of any revolutionary innovations. Rather, innovations help improve mechanical reliability, lower manufacturing costs and allow for easier maintainability and operability. As mine throughputs increase, Multotec continues to add larger machine models to the existing range. The Multotec Samplers, Solid/Liquid and Magnetic Separation (SSM) Division holds a strategic market in the industry, with mechanically strong and reliable machines that consistently deliver a low cost of ownership. It is through high-quality components that the SSM Division provides reliability across the product range. Yet, these components come with a price tag and there is always room for cost optimisation, which led Multotec SSM to the first of the top 5 innovations. 1. Lower cost procurement: leveraging off economies of scale SSM General Manager, Jaco de Beer, negotiated an offset deal with the Divisions magnetic supplier taking losses or break-even cost on this product in exchange for reallocating gains on the samplers business. This resulted in a cessation of the silos experienced between samplers and magnetics procurement found within the SSM Division. The benefit is a reliable supplier that manufactures a machine with improved quality to that of competitors. Such an advantage benefits both new and existing SSM customers with continuously low cost of machine ownership. 2. Improved technical sales support material With Covid-19s influence, Multotec SSM has experienced less customer interaction over the last few months, which will continue into the foreseeable future. This means that remote sales will increase, and Multotec employees may not always have face-to-face opportunities to explain their machines and technologies to new clients (including those of overseas markets). In turn, Multotec has placed large efforts on the improvement of quote and tender documents to explain their products and technologies to customers (including those who use English as second language) in easy-to-understand terminology. These improved documents define the features, advantages and benefits these products and services hold for customers. Although Multotec already supports products with technical sales material, the Division has gone the extra mile to better explain their machines to assist clients with technical adjudication. Willem Slabbert, SSM Manager, believes that their quote and tender documents now match the quality of their equipment, which stand out from the rest. 3. Customers and colleagues are included in Multotecs value offer Multotec SSMs customers often do not have to work at a level in which they fully comprehend how and why Multotec recommends certain machines or bespoke machine models for their application. Slabbert says that when these fundamental details are left unexplained, customers decision making (or technical adjudication) tends to lean towards lowest cost procurement. To counter this, Multotec has implemented a sales tool document called an Application Brief per product, which has the following characteristics: Explains the application at a very high level, e.g. what an overbelt is used for; what the purpose of the machine is; what advantages/benefits there are for the client if they had a magnet (any suppliers magnet). Finds out about the critical application parameters that affect the operation of the machine and the size selection. The documents are short (1-2 A4 pages). The tone and register are simple for anyone to understand. 4. Environmentally friendly overbelt magnet transformers An advancement in electrical technology allows for Multotecs overbelt magnets to be more environmentally friendly. This is done by using an air-cooled system and replacing the conventional oil cooled transformer-rectifier with a digital based direct current generator. When this is done, no changes are made to the coil, known as the magnetic heart of the machine, but rather a change made in the electrical supply to the coil. The advantages of this air-cooled system are: Increased energy efficiency with lower heat loss More direct current control despite varying supply voltage surges into the control panel Increased electromagnetic coil protection Smaller panel footprint and a lower weight No oil (does not pose an environmental oil spillage hazard) It is important to note that these advancements are only cost-effective for larger model overbelt magnets. 5. Wet Drum Magnetic SeparatorLevel Control Wet drum magnetic separators do not work efficiently if the slurry level in the machine is low. Traditionally, this level is never controlled but regulated by mechanical means only. SSM has built a test rig that allows the underflow of the machine to be automatically controlled, controlling the level in the machine through an electro-mechanical linear actuator coupled to a hose clamp. Wet Drum Magnetic Separator showing level control rod (light blue) connected to closing pinchers (green & brown) at the machine underflow outlet hoses (black) which will be adjusted by the linear actuator (dark blue) acting on a torque arm system. The control logic of the unit is provided by smart relay technology, a computer programmable device 90 % more cost-effective than a typical PLC. The smart relay allows just enough functionality in terms of its inputs and outputs to control this simple system. A level sensor in the tank informs the controller of the current tank levels. The controller then runs calculations, adjusting the linear actuator to open or close the underflow hose. If the hose opening is restricted more, flow out of the unit will reduce and the level in the tank will rise. After testing, the design will be retrofittable to any existing magnetic separator (not only Multotec supply) and can greatly improve wet drum magnetic separator efficiencies.

Magnets have been used to manufacture mineral processing machines for decades. Given their history, magnetic technology and physics are recognised as a developed art. In the global magnetic separation industry, the magnetic heart of the machine has generally remained unchanged and short of any revolutionary innovations. Rather, innovations help improve mechanical reliability, lower manufacturing costs and allow for easier maintainability and operability. As mine throughputs increase, Multotec continues to add larger machine models to the existing range.

The Multotec Samplers, Solid/Liquid and Magnetic Separation (SSM) Division holds a strategic market in the industry, with mechanically strong and reliable machines that consistently deliver a low cost of ownership. It is through high-quality components that the SSM Division provides reliability across the product range. Yet, these components come with a price tag and there is always room for cost optimisation, which led Multotec SSM to the first of the top 5 innovations.

SSM General Manager, Jaco de Beer, negotiated an offset deal with the Divisions magnetic supplier taking losses or break-even cost on this product in exchange for reallocating gains on the samplers business. This resulted in a cessation of the silos experienced between samplers and magnetics procurement found within the SSM Division.

The benefit is a reliable supplier that manufactures a machine with improved quality to that of competitors. Such an advantage benefits both new and existing SSM customers with continuously low cost of machine ownership.

With Covid-19s influence, Multotec SSM has experienced less customer interaction over the last few months, which will continue into the foreseeable future. This means that remote sales will increase, and Multotec employees may not always have face-to-face opportunities to explain their machines and technologies to new clients (including those of overseas markets).

In turn, Multotec has placed large efforts on the improvement of quote and tender documents to explain their products and technologies to customers (including those who use English as second language) in easy-to-understand terminology. These improved documents define the features, advantages and benefits these products and services hold for customers.

Although Multotec already supports products with technical sales material, the Division has gone the extra mile to better explain their machines to assist clients with technical adjudication. Willem Slabbert, SSM Manager, believes that their quote and tender documents now match the quality of their equipment, which stand out from the rest.

Multotec SSMs customers often do not have to work at a level in which they fully comprehend how and why Multotec recommends certain machines or bespoke machine models for their application. Slabbert says that when these fundamental details are left unexplained, customers decision making (or technical adjudication) tends to lean towards lowest cost procurement. To counter this, Multotec has implemented a sales tool document called an Application Brief per product, which has the following characteristics:

An advancement in electrical technology allows for Multotecs overbelt magnets to be more environmentally friendly. This is done by using an air-cooled system and replacing the conventional oil cooled transformer-rectifier with a digital based direct current generator. When this is done, no changes are made to the coil, known as the magnetic heart of the machine, but rather a change made in the electrical supply to the coil.

SSM has built a test rig that allows the underflow of the machine to be automatically controlled, controlling the level in the machine through an electro-mechanical linear actuator coupled to a hose clamp.

Wet Drum Magnetic Separator showing level control rod (light blue) connected to closing pinchers (green & brown) at the machine underflow outlet hoses (black) which will be adjusted by the linear actuator (dark blue) acting on a torque arm system.

The control logic of the unit is provided by smart relay technology, a computer programmable device 90 % more cost-effective than a typical PLC. The smart relay allows just enough functionality in terms of its inputs and outputs to control this simple system. A level sensor in the tank informs the controller of the current tank levels.

The controller then runs calculations, adjusting the linear actuator to open or close the underflow hose. If the hose opening is restricted more, flow out of the unit will reduce and the level in the tank will rise.

worldwide magnetic separator market to 2028 - key developments and strategies

worldwide magnetic separator market to 2028 - key developments and strategies

The Global Magnetic Separator Market is poised to grow strong during the forecast period 2018 to 2028. Some of the prominent trends that the market is witnessing include advancements in magnetic separation technology, increasing recycling rates across the globe, and increasing use of superconducting magnets in magnetic separators.With respect to the end user, the market is segmented into food & beverages, metal and mineral mining, mining, recycling, chemical & pharmaceutical, hospitals, acadamic & research institutes, processing industries, diagnostics laboratories, biotechnology companies, clinical research organizations, glass & textile, ceramics, paper, and plastics, and other end users. Other end users is divided into power & energy, oil & gas, and construction.This industry report analyzes the market estimates and forecasts of all the given segments on global as well as regional levels presented in the research scope. The study provides historical market data for 2015, 2016 revenue estimations are presented for 2017 and forecasts from 2018 till 2028. The study focuses on market trends, leading players, supply chain trends, technological innovations, key developments, and future strategies. With comprehensive market assessment across the major geographies such as North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East, Latin America and Rest of the world the report is a valuable asset for the existing players, new entrants and the future investors.The study presents detailed market analysis with inputs derived from industry professionals across the value chain. A special focus has been made on 23 countries such as U.S., Canada, Mexico, U.K., Germany, Spain, France, Italy, China, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, etc. The market data is gathered from extensive primary interviews and secondary research. The market size is calculated based on the revenue generated through sales from all the given segments and sub segments in the research scope. The market sizing analysis includes both top-down and bottom-up approaches for data validation and accuracy measures.Report Highlights:

Key Topics Covered: 1 Market Outline 1.1 Research Methodology 1.1.1 Research Approach & Sources 1.2 Market Trends 1.3 Regulatory Factors 1.4 Product Analysis 1.5 Application Analysis 1.6 End User Analysis 1.7 Strategic Benchmarking 1.8 Opportunity Analysis 2 Executive Summary 3 Market Overview 3.1 Current Trends 3.1.1 Advancements in Magnetic Separation Technology 3.1.2 Increasing Recycling Rates Across the Globe 3.1.3 Increasing use of Superconducting Magnets in Magnetic Separators 3.1.4 Growth Opportunities/Investment Opportunities 3.2 Drivers 3.3 Constraints 3.4 Industry Attractiveness 3.4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers 3.4.2 Bargaining power of buyers 3.4.3 Threat of substitutes 3.4.4 Threat of new entrants 3.4.5 Competitive rivalry 4 Magnetic Separator Market, By Product Type 4.1 Magnetic Seperation Rack4.2 Magnetic Seperation Tray5 Magnetic Separator Market, By Magnet Type 5.1 Permanent Magnets5.2 Self Cleaning Magnets5.3 Electromagnets6 Magnetic Separator Market, By Type 6.1 Standalone Magnetic Separators6.1.1 Bars & Rods6.1.2 Filters6.1.3 Grates6.1.4 Plates6.1.5 Pulleys6.1.6 Chutes & Humps6.1.7 Plates6.1.8 Other Standalone Magnetic Separators6.1.8.1 Bullet/Pipe Magnets 6.1.8.2 Cascade Magnets 6.1.8.3 Wedge Magnets 6.1.8.4 Strip Magnets 6.2 Magnetic Separator Equipment6.2.1 Magnetic Roller Separator6.2.2 Magnetic Drum Seperato6.2.3 Magnetic Pulley Seperator6.2.4 Magnetic Overband/ Cross Belt Seperator6.2.5 Square Magnetic Separator6.2.6 Eddy Current Separators6.2.7 Tubular Magnetic Separator6.2.8 Magnetic Coolant Seperator7 Magnetic Separator Market, By Material Type 7.1 Wet Type7.2 Dry Type8 Magnetic Separator Market, By Cleaning Type 8.1 Automatic8.2 Manual9 Magnetic Separator Market, By Components 9.1 Feed Hopper9.2 Conveyor Belt9.3 Magnet9.4 Collection Tank10 Magnetic Separator Market, By Sales Channel 10.1 Aftermarket10.2 Manufacturer/Distributor/Service Provider11 Magnetic Separator Market, By Intensity 11.1 High Intensity11.2 Low Intensity11.3 Medium Intensity12 Magnetic Separator Market, By Application 12.1 Protein Purification & Isolation12.2 Cell Analysis12.3 DNA/RNA Purification12.4 Epigenetics13 Magnetic Separator Market, By End User 13.1 Food & Beverages13.2 Metal And Mineral Mining13.3 Mining13.4 Recycling13.5 Chemical & Pharmaceutical13.6 Hospitals13.7 Acadamic & Research Institutes13.8 Processing Industries13.9 Diagnostics Laboratories13.10 Biotechnology Companies13.11 Clinical Research Organizations13.12 Glass & Textile13.13 Ceramics, Paper, and Plastics13.14 Other End Users13.14.1 Power & Energy13.14.2 Oil & Gas13.14.3 Construction14 Magnetic Separator Market, By Geography 14.1 North America14.2 Europe14.3 Asia Pacific14.4 Middle East14.5 Latin America14.6 Rest of the World (RoW)15 Key Player Activities 15.1 Acquisitions & Mergers 15.2 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures 15.3 Product Launch & Expansions 15.4 Other Activities 16 Leading Companies 16.1 Bunting Magnetics 16.2 Eclipse Magnetics 16.3 Eriez Manufacturing Co. 16.4 GIAMAG Technologies AS 16.5 GouDSMit Magnetics 16.6 Henan Caesar Heavy Machinery Co., Ltd 16.7 Industrial Magnetics 16.8 Innovative Magnetic Technologies 16.9 Jupiter Magnetics 16.10 K.W. Supply Magneetsystemen 16.11 Longi Magnet 16.12 Malvern Engineering 16.13 Metso 16.14 Multotec 16.15 Nippon Magnetics 16.16 STEINERT Elektromagnetbau GmbH For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/bl5u86

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected] For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900 U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

recent advances in microfluidic technologies for separation of biological cells | springerlink

recent advances in microfluidic technologies for separation of biological cells | springerlink

Cell separation has always been a key topic in academic research, especially in the fields of medicine and biology, due to its significance in diagnosis and treatment. Accurate, high-throughput and non-invasive separation of individual cells is key to driving the development of biomedicine and cellular biology. In recent years, a series of researches on the use of microfluidic technologies for cell separation have been conducted to solve bio-related problems. Hence, we present here a comprehensive review on the recent developments of microfluidic technologies for cell separation. In this review, we discuss several cell separation methods, mainly including: physical and biochemical method, their working principles as well as their practical applications. We also analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each method in detail. In addition, the current challenges and future prospects of microfluidic-based cell separation were discussed.

E. Brouzes, M. Medkova, N. Savenelli, D. Marran, M. Twardowski, J.B. Hutchison, J.M. Rothberg, D.R. Link, N. Perrimon, M.L. Samuels, Droplet microfluidic technology for single-cell high-throughput screening. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 1419514200 (2009)

Burguillos, M. A., Magnusson, C., Nordin, M., Lenshof, A., Augustsson, P., Hansson, M. J., Elm RE, , Lilja, H., Brundin, P., Laurell, T. & Deierborg, T. 2013. Microchannel acoustophoresis does not impact survival or function of microglia, leukocytes or tumor cells. PLoS One, 8, e64233

P.-Y. Chu, C.-J. Liao, C.-H. Hsieh, H.-M. Wang, W.-P. Chou, P.-H. Chen, Wu, M.-H., Utilization of optically induced dielectrophoresis in a microfluidic system for sorting and isolation of cells with varied degree of viability: Demonstration of the sorting and isolation of drug-treated cancer cells with various degrees of anti-cancer drug resistance gene expression. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 283, 621631 (2019)

D.J. Collins, Z. Ma, Y. Ai, Highly localized acoustic streaming and size-selective submicrometer particle concentration using high frequency microscale focused acoustic fields. Anal. Chem. 88, 55135522 (2016)

j. Dykes, a. Lenshof, M.I.B. strand-Grundstr, T. Laurell, S. Scheding, Efficient removal of platelets from peripheral blood progenitor cell products using a novel micro-chip based acoustophoretic platform. PLoS One 6, e23074 (2011)

F. Fachin, P. Spuhler, J.M. Martel-Foley, J.F. Edd, T.A. Barber, J. Walsh, M. Karabacak, V. Pai, M. Yu, K. Smith, H. Hwang, J. Yang, S. Shah, R. Yarmush, L.V. Sequist, S.L. Stott, S. Maheswaran, D.A. Haber, R. Kapur, M. Toner, Monolithic chip for high-throughput blood cell depletion to sort rare circulating tumor cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 10936 (2017)

Y. He, B.L. Huang, D.X. Lu, J. Zhao, B.B. Xu, R. Zhang, X.F. Lin, Q.D. Chen, J. Wang, Y.L. Zhang, H.B. Sun, Overpass at the junction of a crossed microchannel: An enabler for 3D microfluidic chips. Lab Chip 12, 38663869 (2012)

T. Henighan, A. Chen, G. Vieira, A.J. Hauser, F.Y. Yang, J.J. Chalmers, R. Sooryakumar, Manipulation of magnetically labeled and unlabeled cells with Mobile magnetic traps. Biophys. J. 98, 412417 (2010)

J.A. Hernndez-Castro, K. Li, A. Meunier, D. Juncker, T. Veres, Fabrication of large-area polymer microfilter membranes and their application for particle and cell enrichment. Lab Chip 17, 19601969 (2017)

R. Huang, T.A. Barber, M.A. Schmidt, R.G. Tompkins, M. Toner, D.W. Bianchi, R. Kapur, W.L. Flejter, A microfluidics approach for the isolation of nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) from the peripheral blood of pregnant women. Prenat. Diagn. 28, 892899 (2008)

S. Huang, M. Wu, Y. Lin, C. Hsieh, C. Yang, H. Lin, C. Tseng, G. Lee, High-purity and label-free isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in a microfluidic platform by using optically-induced-dielectrophoretic (ODEP) force. Lab Chip 13, 13711383 (2013)

T.H. Kim, H.J. Yoon, S. Fouladdel, Y. Wang, M. Kozminsky, M.L. Burness, C. Paoletti, L. Zhao, E. Azizi, M.S. Wicha, S. Nagrath, Characterizing circulating tumor cells isolated from metastatic breast cancer patients using graphene oxide based microfluidic assay. Adv. Biosyst. 3, 1800278 (2019)

T. Kumo, Y. Tomizawa, M. Kita, H. Takabayashi, Y. Takamura, Concentration and extraction chip of fetal nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) by micro gap with diaphragm for fetal DNA diagnosis from maternal blood. Microsyst. Technol. 23, 53515355 (2017)

K.W. Kwon, S.S. Choi, S.H. Lee, B. Kim, S.N. Lee, M.C. Park, P. Kim, S.Y. Hwang, K.Y. Suh, Label-free, microfluidic separation and enrichment of human breast cancer cells by adhesion difference. Lab Chip 7, 14611468 (2007)

P. Li, Z. Mao, Z. Peng, L. Zhou, Y. Chen, P.-H. Huang, C.I. Truica, J.J. Drabick, W.S. El-Deiry, M. Dao, S. Suresh, T.J. Huang, Acoustic separation of circulating tumor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 49704975 (2015)

C.J. Liao, C.H. Hsieh, T.K. Chiu, Y.X. Zhu, H.M. Wang, F.C. Hung, W.P. Chou, Wu, M. H., An optically induced dieslectrophoresis (ODEP)-based microfluidic system for the isolation of high-purity CD45(neg)/EpCAM(neg) cells from the blood samples of Cancer patients-demonstration and initial exploration of the clinical significance of these cells. Micromachines (Basel) 9 (2018)

G. Liu, F. He, X. Li, H. Zhao, Y. Zhang, Z. Li, Z. Yang, Multi-level separation of particles using acoustic radiation force and hydraulic force in a microfluidic chip. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 23, 23 (2019)

T. Luo, L. Fan, Y. Zeng, Y. Liu, S. Chen, Q. Tan, R.H.W. Lam, D. Sun, A simplified sheathless cell separation approach using combined gravitational-sedimentation-based prefocusing and dielectrophoretic separation. Lab Chip 18, 15211532 (2018)

H.S. Moon, K. Kwon, S.I. Kim, H. Han, J. Sohn, S. Lee, H.I. Jung, Continuous separation of breast cancer cells from blood samples using multi-orifice flow fractionation (MOFF) and dielectrophoresis (DEP). Lab Chip 11, 11181125 (2011)

J.H. Myung, C.A. Launiere, D.T. Eddington, S. Hong, Enhanced tumor cell isolation by a biomimetic combination of E-selectin and anti-EpCAM: Implications for the effective separation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Langmuir 26, 85898596 (2010)

K. Nagase, R. Shukuwa, H. Takahashi, N. Takeda, T. Okano, Enhanced mechanical properties and cell separation with thermal control of PIPAAm-brushed polymer-blend microfibers. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 60176026 (2020)

S. Nagrath, L.V. Sequist, S. Maheswaran, D.W. Bell, D. Irimia, L. Ulkus, M.R. Smith, E.L. Kwak, S. Digumarthy, A. Muzikansky, P. Ryan, U.J. Balis, R.G. Tompkins, D.A. Haber, M. Toner, Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology. Nature 450, 12351239 (2007)

B. Ngamsom, M.M. Esfahani, C. Phurimsak, M.J. Lopez-Martinez, J.C. Raymond, P. Broyer, P. Patel, N. Pamme, Multiplex sorting of foodborne pathogens by on-chip free-flow magnetophoresis. Anal. Chim. Acta 918, 6976 (2016)

A.K. Rengan, A.B. Bukhari, A. Pradhan, R. Malhotra, R. Banerjee, R. Srivastava, De, A., In vivo analysis of biodegradable liposome gold nanoparticles as efficient agents for photothermal therapy of cancer. Nano Lett. 15, 842848 (2015)

H. Safarpour, S. Dehghani, R. Nosrati, N. Zebardast, M. Alibolandi, A. Mokhtarzadeh, M. Ramezani, Optical and electrochemical-based nano-aptasensing approaches for the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Biosens. Bioelectron. 148, 111833 (2020)

Q. Shen, L. Xu, L. Zhao, D. Wu, Y. Fan, Y. Zhou, W.H. Ouyang, X. Xu, Z. Zhang, M. Song, T. Lee, M.A. Garcia, B. Xiong, S. Hou, H.R. Tseng, X. Fang, Specific capture and release of circulating tumor cells using aptamer-modified nanosubstrates. Adv. Mater. 25, 23682373 (2013)

S. Shen, C. Ma, L. Zhao, Y. Wang, J.C. Wang, J. Xu, T. Li, L. Pang, J. Wang, High-throughput rare cell separation from blood samples using steric hindrance and inertial microfluidics. Lab Chip 14, 25252538 (2014)

S.L. Stott, C.H. Hsu, D.I. Tsukrov, M. Yu, D.T. Miyamoto, B.A. Waltman, S.M. Rothenberg, A.M. Shah, M.E. Smas, G.K. Korir, F.P. Floyd Jr., A.J. Gilman, J.B. Lord, D. Winokur, S. Springer, D. Irimia, S. Nagrath, L.V. Sequist, R.J. Lee, K.J. Isselbacher, S. Maheswaran, D.A. Haber, M. Toner, Isolation of circulating tumor cells using a microvortex-generating herringbone-chip. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 1839218397 (2010)

F. Tanaka, K. Yoneda, N. Kondo, M. Hashimoto, T. Takuwa, S. Matsumoto, Y. Okumura, S. Rahman, N. Tsubota, T. Tsujimura, K. Kuribayashi, K. Fukuoka, T. Nakano, S. Hasegawa, Circulating tumor cell as a diagnostic marker in primary lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 69806986 (2009)

M. Vojtisek, M.D. Tarn, N. Hirota, N. Pamme, Microfluidic devices in superconducting magnets: On-chip free-flow diamagnetophoresis of polymer particles and bubbles. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 13, 625635 (2012)

J. Wang, W. Lu, C. Tang, Y. Liu, J. Sun, X. Mu, L. Zhang, B. Dai, X. Li, H. Zhuo, X. Jiang, Label-free isolation and mRNA detection of circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic lung Cancer for disease diagnosis and monitoring therapeutic efficacy. Anal. Chem. 87, 1189311900 (2015)

K. Wang, W. Zhou, Z. Lin, F. Cai, F. Li, J. Wu, L. Meng, L. Niu, H. Zheng, Sorting of tumour cells in a microfluidic device by multi-stage surface acoustic waves. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 258, 11741183 (2018)

X. Wei, B. Cai, K. Chen, L. Cheng, Y. Zhu, Z. Wang, Y. Sun, W. Liu, S.-S. Guo, Y. Zhang, X.-Z. Zhao, Enhanced isolation and release of fetal nucleated red blood cells using multifunctional nanoparticle-based microfluidic device for non-invasive prenatal diagnostics. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 281, 131138 (2019)

N. xiang, J. Wang, Q. Li, Y. Han, D. Huang, Z. Ni, Precise size-based cell separation via the coupling of inertial microfluidics and deterministic lateral displacement. Anal. Chem. 91, 1032810334 (2019)

Y. Zhang, W. Li, Y. Zhou, A. Johnson, A. Venable, A. Hassan, J. Griswold, D. Pappas, Detection of sepsis in patient blood samples using CD64 expression in a microfluidic cell separation device. Analyst 143, 241249 (2017)

W. Zhao, C.H. Cui, S. Bose, D. Guo, C. Shen, W.P. Wong, K. Halvorsen, O.C. Farokhzad, G.S. Teo, J.A. Phillips, D.M. Dorfman, R. Karnik, J.M. Karp, Bioinspired multivalent DNA network for capture and release of cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 1962619631 (2012)

S. Zheng, H. Lin, J.Q. Liu, M. Balic, R. Datar, R.J. Cote, Y.C. Tai, Membrane microfilter device for selective capture, electrolysis and genomic analysis of human circulating tumor cells. J. Chromatogr. A 1162, 154161 (2007)

The authors wish to acknowledge the funding provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 61803323) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Project No. ZR2019BF049).

Sun, L., Yang, W., Cai, S. et al. Recent advances in microfluidic technologies for separation of biological cells. Biomed Microdevices 22, 55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-020-00510-7

global million magnetic separator market insights (2020 to

global million magnetic separator market insights (2020 to

Dublin, Feb. 13, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Magnetic Separator Market by Type (Drum, Overband, Roller, Pulleys, Plates, Grates, and Bars), Magnet Type (Permanent Magnets, Electromagnets), Material Type, Cleaning Type, Industry (Mining, Recycling, Food & Beverages) & Region - Global Forecast to 2025" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering. The magnetic separator market was valued at USD 685 million in 2019, and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 5.1% from 2020 to 2025 to reach USD 928 million, by 2025.

One of the major driving factors for the magnetic separator market is the increase in recycling rates across the world. Also, due to the stringent rules and regulations pertaining to quality in the food & beverages industry, the demand for magnetic separators is increasing. Expansion and urbanization in developing countries are also driving the growth of the magnetic separator market. However, the manufacturing of low-quality magnetic separators in developing countries restrains the market growth.

Eriez Magnetics (US), Metso Oyj (Finland), STEINERT GmbH (Germany), Nippon Magnetics (Japan), Goudsmit Magnetics (The Netherlands), Bunting Magnetics (US), Eclipse Magnetics (UK), Industrial Magnetics (US), K.W. Supply Magneetsystemen (The Netherlands), and Multotec Pty Ltd. (South Africa) are among the few key players in the magnetic separator market.

Based on standalone magnet type, magnetic separator market for magnetic pulleys to grow at highest CAGR during forecast periodThe magnetic separator market for magnetic pulleys is expected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. Magnetic pulleys are used as head pulleys for conveyor belts. These pulleys can be built into an existing conveyor belt system as a head. With the increase in the application areas of magnetic separators, companies are developing new ways to use magnetic pulleys for efficient separation in industries such as mining and recycling. This is expected to increase the demand for magnetic pulleys during the forecast period.Based on industry, recycling industry to hold significant share from 2020 to 2025Magnetic separators are used for various processes in the recycling industry, such as glass recycling, scrap material recycling, PET flakes recycling, plastic recycling, rubber recycling, municipal solid waste recycling, and e-waste recycling. Owing to an increase in the waste produced by countries across the world, the need for recycling is ever increasing. The recycling industry is picking up in countries such as the US and Canada, as China has implemented the National Sword Policy, which puts restrictions on the waste being imported by the country. These developments are expected to provide stimulus to the recycling industry across the world and propel the demand for magnetic separators.Market in APAC to grow at significant CAGR during forecast periodThe magnetic separator market in APAC is expected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. This growth can be attributed to the significantly growing mining industry in the region, led by China. China is the world's largest producer of coal, gold, iron ore, and most rare earth minerals. It is also the world's leading consumer of most mining products. This has provided a major boost to the mining industry in the country and the overall APAC region.

Also, South Korea stands third in the list of countries having the best recycling rates, only behind Germany and Austria. According to a 2019 report by the European Environmental Agency (EEA), the country recycles ~54% of its municipal and household waste. The South Korean government is aiming to increase this recycling rate further, which is expected to propel the demand for magnetic separators in the recycling industry.

1 Introduction2 Research Methodology3 Executive Summary 4 Premium Insights 4.1 Attractive Opportunities in the Magnetic Separator Market4.2 Market, By Magnet Type and Industry4.3 Market, By Equipment Type4.4 Country-Wise Magnetic Separator Market Growth Rate5 Market Overview 5.1 Introduction5.2 Market Dynamics5.2.1 Drivers5.2.1.1 Expansion and Urbanization in Developing Countries5.2.1.2 Stringent Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Quality in the Food & Beverages Industry5.2.1.3 Increasing Recycling Rates Across the World5.2.2 Restraints5.2.2.1 Manufacturing of Low-Quality Magnetic Separators in Developing Countries5.2.3 Opportunities5.2.3.1 Advancements in Magnetic Separation Technology5.2.3.2 Increasing use of Superconducting Magnets in Magnetic Separators5.2.4 Challenges5.2.4.1 Safety Concerns Related to use of Magnetic Separators5.3 Value Chain Analysis6 Magnetic Separator Market, By Type 6.1 Introduction6.2 Magnetic Separator Equipment6.2.1 Drum6.2.1.1 Drum Magnetic Separators are Used in Industries Such as Food & Beverages, Chemical & Pharmaceutical, and Glass6.2.2 Roller6.2.2.1 Roller Magnetic Separators are Made of Alloys of Rare Earth Elements and are More Powerful Compared to Other Magnets6.2.3 Overband (Suspended)6.2.3.1 Overband Magnetic Separators are Ideal for Removing High Volumes of Iron Particles and Mainly Used in Recycling and Mining Industries6.2.4 Eddy Current Separators6.2.4.1 Eddy Current Separators are Used to Remove Non-Ferrous Conducting Metals6.3 Standalone Magnetic Separators6.3.1 Pulleys6.3.1.1 Magnetic Pulleys Find Major Applications in Mining and Recycling Industries6.3.2 Bars & Rods6.3.2.1 Magnetic Bars & Rods are Used to Remove Ferrous Contaminants From Both Dry and Liquid Applications6.3.3 Plates6.3.3.1 Plate Magnets are Used to Separate Ferrous Impurities From Free Flowing and Pneumatically Conveyed Materials6.3.4 Grates6.3.4.1 Grate Magnets are Mainly Used in Industries, Such as Food, Plastics & Ceramics, and Pharmaceutical6.3.5 Drawers6.3.5.1 Drawer Magnets Provide Excellent Equipment and Product Protection of Medium and Fine Ferrous Contaminants in Dry, Free-Flowing Products Under Gravity Flow6.3.6 Filters6.3.6.1 Magnetic Filters are Mostly Used for Wet Applications6.3.7 Chutes & Humps6.3.7.1 Chutes & Humps Provide Excellent Separation Results for High Volume, Poor Flowing, or Abrasive Materials6.3.8 Others6.3.8.1 Other Magnetic Separators are Used Where Product Purity is the Top-Most Priority7 Magnetic Separator Market, By Magnet Type 7.1 Introduction7.2 Permanent Magnets7.2.1 Permanent Magnet Separators are Less Expensive Than Electromagnetic Separators and Do Not Require Continuous Electrical Supply7.3 Electromagnets7.3.1 Electromagnetic Separators are Preferred in Applications Where Different Strength Levels of Magnetism are Required8 Magnetic Separator Market, By Cleaning Type 8.1 Introduction8.2 Manual8.2.1 Manual Magnetic Separators are Less Costly as Compared to Automatic Magnetic Separators and are Preferred in Small and Medium-Sized Industries8.3 Automatic8.3.1 Automatic Magnetic Separators Help to Reduce Manpower Requirement and Provide Higher Safety Than Manual Magnetic Separators9 Magnetic Separator Market, By Material Type 9.1 Introduction9.2 Dry9.2.1 Increasing Importance of Magnetic Separators for Removal of Contaminants From Coarse and Fine Materials Provides Growth Opportunity for the Market9.3 Wet9.3.1 Market Growth is Driven By Wastewater Management and Beverages Applications10 Magnetic Separator Components 10.1 Introduction10.2 Feed Hopper10.3 Magnet10.4 Conveyor Belt10.5 Collection Tank11 Magnetic Separator, By Intensity 11.1 Introduction11.2 High Intensity11.3 Low & Medium Intensity12 Magnetic Separator Market, By Industry 12.1 Introduction12.2 Recycling12.2.1 Increase in Waste Production to Increase the Demand for Magnetic Separators in the Recycling Industry During the Forecast Period12.3 Mining12.3.1 Increasing Mining Projects Across the World to Drive Market Growth12.4 Chemical & Pharmaceutical12.4.1 Stringent Rules & Regulations for the Quality of Medicines to Drive the Market in Chemical & Pharmaceutical Industry12.5 Ceramics, Paper, and Plastics12.5.1 Rising Plastic Waste Across the World to Provide Growth Opportunities for the Market12.6 Food & Beverages12.6.1 Magnetic Separators are Vital in the Food & Beverages Industry as They Help in Removing Ferrous Contaminants From Food Products12.7 Glass & Textile12.7.1 Growing Glass Industry Across Major Economies Provides Huge Opportunities for Magnetic Separator Providers12.8 Others13 Geographic Analysis 13.1 Introduction13.2 North America13.2.1 US13.2.1.1 Growing Recycling Industry in the US to Provide Growth Opportunities for the Market Players13.2.2 Canada13.2.2.1 Growing Chemical & Pharmaceutical Industry in the Country Set to Offer Significant Opportunities for the Market13.2.3 Mexico13.2.3.1 Various International Magnetic Separator Providers Have Set Up Their Manufacturing and Sales Offices in Mexico in Recent Years13.3 Europe13.3.1 UK13.3.1.1 Growing Application of Magnetic Separators for Plastic Processing to Boost the Market During Forecast Period13.3.2 Germany13.3.2.1 Market in Germany to Grow at Highest CAGR During Forecast Period13.3.3 France13.3.3.1 Growing Food & Beverages Industry in France to Drive Market Growth13.3.4 Italy13.3.4.1 Growing Awareness About Benefits of Waste Management to Drive the Market Growth in Italy13.3.5 Rest of Europe13.3.5.1 Countries in Rest of Europe Contribute Significantly to the Growth of the Market13.4 Asia Pacific (APAC)13.4.1 China13.4.1.1 China Expected to Account for the Largest Market Share in APAC13.4.2 Japan13.4.2.1 Growing Pharmaceutical Industry in Japan Presents Significant Growth Opportunities13.4.3 South Korea13.4.3.1 South Korean Government has Taken Various Initiatives to Strengthen the Recycling Industry in the Country13.4.4 Rest of APAC13.4.4.1 Countries in Rest of APAC Present an Attractive Opportunity for Magnetic Separator Providers During Forecast Period13.5 Rest of the World (RoW)13.5.1 South America13.5.1.1 South America Expected to Grow at a Higher CAGR During Forecast Period13.5.2 Middle East & Africa13.5.2.1 Growing Mining and Construction Industries in the Region to Propel the Demand for Magnetic Separators14 Competitive Landscape 14.1 Overview14.2 Market Ranking Analysis: Magnetic Separator Market, 201914.3 Competitive Leadership Mapping14.3.1 Visionary Leaders14.3.2 Innovators14.3.3 Dynamic Differentiators14.3.4 Emerging Companies14.4 Strength of Product Portfolio (25 Players)14.5 Business Strategy Excellence (25 Players)14.6 Competitive Situations and Trends14.6.1 Product Launches14.6.2 Partnerships, Agreements & Joint Ventures14.6.3 Expansions14.6.4 Mergers & Acquisitions15 Company Profiles 15.1 Key Players15.1.1 Eriez15.1.2 Metso15.1.3 STEINERT15.1.4 Nippon Magnetics15.1.5 GouDSMit Magnetics15.1.6 Bunting Magnetics15.1.7 Eclipse Magnetics15.1.8 Industrial Magnetics15.1.9 K.W. Supply Magneetsystemen15.1.10 Multotec15.2 Right to Win15.3 Other Players15.3.1 Innovative Magnetic Technologies15.3.2 Jupiter Magnetics15.3.3 Kanetec15.3.4 Longi Magnet15.3.5 Magnetic Products15.3.6 Malvern Engineering15.3.7 Permanent Magnets15.3.8 Shandong Huate Magnet Technology15.3.9 Slon Magnetic Separator15.3.10 Sollau15.3.11 Weifang Guote Mining Equipment

magnetic bead-based nucleic acid market: technological advancements in magnetic bead based nucleic acid methods is expected to drive the market | biospace

magnetic bead-based nucleic acid market: technological advancements in magnetic bead based nucleic acid methods is expected to drive the market | biospace

The magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market is predicted to witness notable growth over the forecast period from 2020 to 2030. Increasing adoption of magnetic beads for the extraction of nucleic acids is a key factor fuelling the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market. Magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction is a commonly used method for nucleic acid purification, thereby boosting the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market.

Availability of a number of magnetic bead-based extraction and purification kits for rapid and reliable extraction of nucleic acids strengthens growth in the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market. Furthermore, uniquely coated magnetic beads bind DNA with high affinity. As a result, DNA of high quality and high purity is obtained after magnetic separation technique. This DNA can be sued for enzyme sequencing, digestion, and analysis.

The report on magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market elucidates demand dynamics and growth trends that are likely to influence the growth curve of the said market for the 2020 2030 forecast period. Furthermore, the report examines key segments and sheds light on growth rate of key segments over the forecast period. Insights into the competitive landscape, with a focus on growth strategies of key players and their revenue share projections over the above mentioned forecast period is another feature of this report.

Competition in the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid market is intense due to the presence of several large players in the fray. R&D for improved extraction techniques is a key growth strategy of keen players in the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market.

Prominent companies operating in the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market include Thermo Fisher Scientific, Roche, Creative Diagnostics, Milan Analytica AG, Analytik Jena AG, Bioneer Corporation, DiaSorin S.p.A., AI Biosciences Inc., QuanDX, Zymo Research, TBG Diagnostics Limited, Aurora Biomed, Hamilton Company, Takara Bio USA, Tecan, Axygen Inc., PerkinElmer Chemagen Technologie GmbH, Diagenode S.A., Covaris Inc., Innosieve Diagnostics, Precision System Science Co. Ltd., Isogen Life Science, Geneaid Biotech Ltd., and Primerdesign among others.

Factors such as technological advancements in magnetic bead based nucleic acid methods, availability of bench top systems, and huge investments for R&D from pharmaceutical majors are spelling growth in the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market.

Furthermore, magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction is less rigorous as compared to conventional DNA separation process that may result into nucleic acid degradation. Thus, a reliable method for nucleic acid isolation is required in molecular biology, which is the basis for a wide range of experiments.

Regionally, the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market is divided into North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East & Africa. Of them, North America is at the forefront in the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market due to common practices of adoption of advanced products and huge investments for R&D of novel nucleic acid extraction techniques.

Asia Pacific is anticipated to emerge as a key region in the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market. Advancements in medical practices in developing economies of the region is indirectly influencing the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction market in the region.

Our reports are single-point solutions for businesses to grow, evolve, and mature. Our real-time data collection methods along with ability to track more than one million high growth niche products are aligned with your aims. The detailed and proprietary statistical models used by our analysts offer insights for making right decision in the shortest span of time. For organizations that require specific but comprehensive information we offer customized solutions through ad hoc reports. These requests are delivered with the perfect combination of right sense of fact-oriented problem solving methodologies and leveraging existing data repositories.

error - cookies turned off

error - cookies turned off

Cookies are disabled for this browser. Wiley Online Library requires cookies for authentication and use of other site features; therefore, cookies must be enabled to browse the site. Detailed information on how Wiley uses cookies can be found in our Privacy Policy.

Please check your email for instructions on resetting your password. If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered, and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account.

developments in the physical separation of iron ore: magnetic separation - sciencedirect

developments in the physical separation of iron ore: magnetic separation - sciencedirect

This chapter introduces the principle of how low-grade iron ores are upgraded to high-quality iron ore concentrates by magnetic separation. Magnetite is the most magnetic of all the naturally occurring minerals on earth, so low-intensity magnetic separators are used to upgrade magnetite ores. On the other hand, because oxidized iron ores like martite, hematite, specularite, limonite, and siderite are weakly magnetic, high-intensity magnetic separators and high-gradient magnetic separators are required to upgrade oxidized iron ores. Therefore, it is important to develop and optimize processing flow sheets according to the nature of iron ore to achieve both high recovery and high grade at a low cost. Three flow sheets for magnetite ores and seven flow sheets for oxidized iron ores separation are discussed.

how to choose magnetic separator_foshan wanjiade technology company limited

how to choose magnetic separator_foshan wanjiade technology company limited

In recent years, with the advancement of magnetic separation technology, electromagnetic separators have greatly improved the quality of magnetic separation concentrates, and are suitable for the recovery of fine iron ore in the development of high efficiency and high magnetic field depth. The electromagnetic magnetic separator can optimize the magnetic field on the existing basis, improve the performance of the magnetic separator, save raw materials and reduce costs.

The magnetic separator can be widely used in metallurgy and other industries, such as mineral processing, cleaning impurities, etc., and can also be used as a special equipment for the recovery of heavy media. Because the traditional drum magnetic separator has the advantages of low operating cost, stable and reliable operation, and suitable for on-site production, it occupies an irreplaceable position in the magnetic separator.

Foshan Wanjiade Technology's electromagnetic magnetic separation equipment has been developed on a large scale. The diversified development of structural forms; sequence opening in product specifications; in terms of control methods, many adopt program control, module circuits and automatic monitoring methods, and enter the high-tech field. At present, various magnetic separation equipment have made new developments. Foshan Wanjiade Technology Magnetic Separator has two main types: electromagnetic cylinder magnetic separator and permanent magnet magnetic roller separator. The material, accuracy and performance of the electromagnetic magnetic separator have been greatly improved.

Countries with high level of foreign magnetic separation technology have conducted certain research on magnetic separators. At present, the separation technology of electromagnetic dry powder machines has reached the level of foreign magnetic separation technology. Foshan Wanjiade Technology is characterized by fine grinding and deep separation, complete models and specifications of iron removal equipment, large-scale equipment, starting from the details, to provide you with satisfactory iron removal equipment.

100 years of innovation in magnetic technology | eclipse magnetics

100 years of innovation in magnetic technology | eclipse magnetics

Our magnetic technology is widely used in a variety of applications worldwide, from providing unique advancements in hi-tech projects to solving functional problems in everyday applications. Find out more about how we solve customer problems with magnetic solutions...

"We chose Eclipse Magnetics to supply our housed grid because they are a respected and well-established brand. They offered us a very competitive price, and the process of ordering and installation was straightforward and reliable."

We are delighted with the Automag installation; its solved all the problems we were having previously with downtime and maintenance costs. The filter means that we are able to use recycled water, which is saving us 1000 per week!

"Here at Qualflow, we base our business on a philosophy of make the product simple to use, reliable and cost-effective. Eclipse Magnetics neodymium magnets offer the strongest magnetic performance, and are nickel plated, making them a cost effective.."

cell separation technology market estimated to record highest cagr by 2027 the courier

cell separation technology market estimated to record highest cagr by 2027 the courier

Transparency Market Research (TMR) has published a new report on the global cell separation technology market for the forecast period of 20192027. According to the report, the global cell separation technology market was valued at ~ US$ 5 Bn in 2018, and is projected to expand at a double-digit CAGR during the forecast period.

Cell separation, also known as cell sorting or cell isolation, is the process of removing cells from biological samples such as tissue or whole blood. Cell separation is a powerful technology that assists biological research. Rising incidences of chronic illnesses across the globe are likely to boost the development of regenerative medicines or tissue engineering, which further boosts the adoption of cell separation technologies by researchers.

Expansion of the global cell separation technology market is attributed to an increase in technological advancements and surge in investments in research & development, such as stem cell research and cancer research. The rising geriatric population is another factor boosting the need for cell separation technologies Moreover, the geriatric population, globally, is more prone to long-term neurological and other chronic illnesses, which, in turn, is driving research to develop treatment for chronic illnesses. Furthermore, increase in the awareness about innovative technologies, such as microfluidics, fluorescent-activated cells sorting, and magnetic activated cells sorting is expected to propel the global cell separation technology market.

North America dominated the global cell separation technology market in 2018, and the trend is anticipated to continue during the forecast period. This is attributed to technological advancements in offering cell separation solutions, presence of key players, and increased initiatives by governments for advancing the cell separation process. However, insufficient funding for the development of cell separation technologies is likely to hamper the global cell separation technology market during the forecast period. Asia Pacific is expected to be a highly lucrative market for cell separation technology during the forecast period, owing to improving healthcare infrastructure along with rising investments in research & development in the region.

Incidences of chronic diseases such as diabetes, obesity, arthritis, cardiac diseases, and cancer are increasing due to sedentary lifestyles, aging population, and increased alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), by 2020, the mortality rate from chronic diseases is expected to reach 73%, and in developing counties, 70% deaths are estimated to be caused by chronic diseases. Southeast Asia, Eastern Mediterranean, and Africa are expected to be greatly affected by chronic diseases. Thus, the increasing burden of chronic diseases around the world is fuelling the demand for cellular therapies to treat chronic diseases. This, in turn, is driving focus and investments on research to develop effective treatments. Thus, increase in cellular research activities is boosting the global cell separation technology market.

The geriatric population is likely to suffer from chronic diseases such as cancer and neurological disorders more than the younger population. Moreover, the geriatric population is increasing at a rapid pace as compared to that of the younger population. Increase in the geriatric population aged above 65 years is projected to drive the incidences of Alzheimers, dementia, cancer, and immune diseases, which, in turn, is anticipated to boost the need for corrective treatment of these disorders. This is estimated to further drive the demand for clinical trials and research that require cell separation products. These factors are likely to boost the global cell separation technology market.

According to the United Nations, the geriatric population aged above 60 is expected to double by 2050 and triple by 2100, an increase from 962 million in 2017 to 2.1 billion in 2050 and 3.1 billion by 2100.

Technological advancements are prompting companies to innovate in microfluidics cell separation technology. Strategic partnerships and collaborations is an ongoing trend, which is boosting the innovation and development of microfluidics-based products. Governments and stakeholders look upon the potential in single cell separation technology and its analysis, which drives them to invest in the development of microfluidics. Companies are striving to build a platform by utilizing their expertise and experience to further offer enhanced solutions to end users.

Stem cell is a prominent cell therapy utilized in the development of regenerative medicine, which is employed in the replacement of tissues or organs, rather than treating them. Thus, stem cell accounted for a prominent share of the global market. The geriatric population is likely to increase at a rapid pace as compared to the adult population, by 2030, which is likely to attract the use of stem cell therapy for treatment. Stem cells require considerably higher number of clinical trials, which is likely to drive the demand for cell separation technology, globally. Rising stem cell research is likely to attract government and private funding, which, in turn, is estimated to offer significant opportunity for stem cell therapies.

The number of biotechnology companies operating across the globe is rising, especially in developing countries. Pharmaceutical companies are likely to use cells separation techniques to develop drugs and continue contributing through innovation. Growing research in stem cell has prompted companies to own large separate units to boost the same. Thus, advancements in developing drugs and treatments, such as CAR-T through cell separation technologies, are likely to drive the segment.

As per research, 449 public biotech companies operate in the U.S., which is expected to boost the biotechnology & pharmaceutical companies segment. In developing countries such as China, China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) reforms pave the way for innovation to further boost biotechnology & pharmaceutical companies in the country.

In terms of region, the global cell separation technology market has been segmented into five major regions: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa. North America dominated the global market in 2018, followed by Europe. North America accounted for a major share of the global cell separation technology market in 2018, owing to the development of cell separation advanced technologies, well-defined regulatory framework, and initiatives by governments in the region to further encourage the research industry. The U.S. is a major investor in stem cell research, which accelerates the development of regenerative medicines for the treatment of various long-term illnesses.

The cell separation technology market in Asia Pacific is projected to expand at a high CAGR from 2019 to 2027. This can be attributed to an increase in healthcare expenditure and large patient population, especially in countries such as India and China. Rising medical tourism in the region and technological advancements are likely to drive the cell separation technology market in the region.

The global cell separation technology market is highly competitive in terms of number of players. Key players operating in the global cell separation technology market include Akadeum Life Sciences, STEMCELL Technologies, Inc., BD, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Miltenyi Biotech, 10X Genomics, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Zeiss, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, PerkinElmer, Inc., and QIAGEN.

These players have adopted various strategies such as expanding their product portfolios by launching new cell separation kits and devices, and participation in acquisitions, establishing strong distribution networks. Companies are expanding their geographic presence in order sustain in the global cell separation technology market. For instance, in May 2019, Akadeum Life Sciences launched seven new microbubble-based products at a conference. In July 2017, BD received the U.S. FDAs clearance for its BD FACS Lyric flow cytometer system, which is used in the diagnosis of immunological disorders.

Transparency Market Research is a global market intelligence company providing global business information reports and services. Our exclusive blend of quantitative forecasting and trends analysis provides forward-looking insight for several decision makers. Our experienced team of analysts, researchers, and consultants use proprietary data sources and various tools and techniques to gather and analyze information.

Our data repository is continuously updated and revised by a team of research experts so that it always reflects latest trends and information. With a broad research and analysis capability, Transparency Market Research employs rigorous primary and secondary research techniques in developing distinctive data sets and research material for business reports.

magnetic separation racks | vwr

magnetic separation racks | vwr

So much has changed during this unprecedented time, except your ability to count on Avantor. We continue to set science in motion to create a better world by providing you with the right solutions to keep moving forward.

Our solutions, developed with you as our focus, are crafted by our team and network of professionals with advanced degrees in science, quality control, engineering, manufacturing and industry experience.

VWR is proud of our years of experience providing choice and excellent service to the Industrial market from Food & Beverage, Petrochemical, Environmental Testing, Waste Water, Cosmetics, Consumer Goods, Agriculture and more...

Weve built our reputation on consistent, comprehensive mastery of day-to-day operations, allowing lab, clinical, and production environments to focus their high-value resources on core scientific priorities.

As our customers needs have evolved, so have our capabilities. We have become experts in scientific operations, improving performance with sophisticated solutions and providing guidance on best practices.

The magnetic separation racks were designed for small scale separations between liquid and magnetic beads. These convenient racks separate the mixture compounds in a completely hands-free method. With a rare earth magnetic embedded housing, it only takes a few minutes for particles to be forced by attraction to the interior sides and leaving the supernatant isolated. Used for analyzing native protein immunoprecipitation, the microtiter magnetic separation racks come in different tube placement quantity options.

To order chemicals, medical devices, or other restricted products please provide ID that includes your business name & shipping address via email [email protected] or fax 484.881.5997 referencing your VWR account number. Acceptable forms of ID are: State issued document with your organization's Federal Tax ID NumberState issued document with your organization's Resale Tax ID NumberCity or County issued Business LicenseState Department of Health Services LicenseAny other ID issued by the State that includes the business name & address

* ATTN: California Customers may require additional documentation as part of the CA Health & Safety Code. Products that fall under this regulation will be placed on a mandatory 21-day hold after documentation is received. VWR will not lift restrictions for residential shipping addresses.

Avantor, a Fortune 500 company, is a leading global provider of mission-critical products and services to customers in the biopharma, healthcare, education & government, and advanced technologies & applied materials industries. Our portfolio is used in virtually every stage of the most important research, development and production activities in the industries we serve. One of our greatest strengths comes from having a global infrastructure that is strategically located to support the needs of our customers. Our global footprint enables us to serve more than 225,000 customer locations and gives us extensive access to research laboratories and scientists in more than 180 countries. We set science in motion to create a better world. For information visit, www.avantorsciences.com and find us on LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook.

water purification using magnetic assistance: a review - sciencedirect

water purification using magnetic assistance: a review - sciencedirect

Water is a major source for survival on this planet. Its conservation is therefore a priority. With the increase in demand, the supply needs to meet specific standards. Several purification techniques have been adopted to meet the standards. Magnetic separation is one purification technique that has been adapted from ore mining industries to anti-scale treatment of pipe lines to seeding magnetic flocculent. No reviews have come up in recent years on the water purification technique using magnetic assistance. The present article brings out a series of information on this water purification technique and explains different aspects of magnetism and magnetic materials for water purification.

Get in Touch with Mechanic
Related Products
Recent Posts
  1. spiral chute separator membranes

  2. magnetic separator manufacturers in chennai

  3. wet drum magnetic separator

  4. magnetite sand magnetic separator price

  5. efficient sandstone magnetic separator sell in canberra

  6. wet magnet separator in south africa

  7. machines that separate gold

  8. high end sandstone magnetic separator sell in albania

  9. high telsa dry drum tymagnetic separator

  10. characterization and beneficiation of anka chromite ore using magnetic separation process

  11. what technical data require for fabricate a rotary dryer drum

  12. manganese ore mining procedure ironoredressingplant

  13. vibro screen

  14. lyon new pyrrhotite stone crushing machine manufacturer

  15. zenith crushers kolkata

  16. sbm high capacity ce certification cement vertical roller mill vertical grinding mill

  17. copper ore mining crushing

  18. jaw crusher mechanism for sale

  19. i sell used mobile crusher roller screen in the us

  20. milling production line 30 tn